Ad Personalization and Transparency in Mobile Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Google's and Apple's EU App Stores

Authors: David Breuer (TU Darmstadt), Lucas Becker (TU Darmstadt), Matthias Hollick (TU Darmstadt)

Volume: 2026
Issue: 1
Pages: 604–630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2026-0031

Download PDF

Abstract: Smartphones have become the primary interface to the Internet for many users, making app stores an essential part of the mobile ecosystem. Apple's App Store and Google's Play Store form a duopoly of the two largest app stores, both of which offer targeted advertisements in their store ecosystems. Consequently, their need for user data to improve the targeting of ads conflicts with users' desire for privacy. Users have to trust the statements given in privacy policies that are often scattered over multiple places and have no way of overseeing how their data is used for ad targeting. The European Union passed several regulations, most notably the DSA and DMA, addressing this transparency issue. The implementation of these laws, however, must be audited to ensure their effectiveness. Unfortunately, the transparency measures implemented in the context of advertising and the ad-targeting mechanisms in app stores have received little attention so far. In this work, we analyze the first-party ad tracking ecosystem on Apple's and Google's app stores. We measure the effects of different account parameters and interest patterns on the ads these accounts receive. Furthermore, we study the transparency measures implemented by the platforms. While we only detect rare occurrences of targeted advertising, we find Google's recommendations to be highly personalized. We notice multiple issues with the realization of transparency measures that affect their effectiveness and, in our opinion, contradict corresponding EU laws.

Keywords: first-party tracking, advertising transparency, targeted advertising, app store privacy, iOS, Android, DSA

Copyright in PoPETs articles are held by their authors. This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.